Two Big Meanies

This is a sample clip from one of our earliest shoots (Playing with Emily), of Emily being a giant smartass under duress.

The dialog:
(*whack*whack*whack*)
Me: Say ‘thank you’.
Emily: Thank you.
(*whack*whack*whack*)
Me: ‘Thank you’ again…
Emily: Thank you again.
(*WHACK*)
Me: Say ‘thank you’ and mean it!
Emily: Thank you and mean it!
(*WHACK*WHACK*WHACK*… )

She’s pretty cute. ^-^

I thought it might be nice to give a sample of the video and audio quality of our older stuff, both so people won’t be scared off by the ‘older’ label, and for comparison. This far back, we had a single inexpensive camcorder with its built-in mic, and a couple halogen worklights. This particular shoot remains one of my very favorites we’ve done (both for fun and for hotness), but our technical quality has improved a lot since then.

(more…)

Lauren and I are going through and attaching additional tags to our blog entries. Most of them should be pretty self-explanatory, you can also check the little tooltip-style titles in the list in the navbar. Some are pretty subjective- what makes a scene ‘heavy’? We’re also only using tags where that’s a significant part of the shoot- for instance, we frequently use some bit of bondage in a utilitarian way, but we’re only tagging shoots ‘bondage’ when the bondage is different or really impacts the scene.

Looking at the list it seems kind of long and undifferentiated, I’m wondering if I should look for a way to break it up into more exciting chunks- maybe ‘models’ under a heading? What do you think? Is it handy in general?

Sometimes I feel like this when we ask questions here…

new & improved look for the blog. Shiny?

I have the killer death bug going around here in Seattle, but was inspired by this. Much trickiness to get it working here though.